Kristian White: Police officer offered 'malleable' defence for tasering great-gran Clare Nowland

Miklos Bolza
AAP
Distressed family members have rushed out of court when bodycam video was played to a jury showing the moment a 95 year old woman was tasered by a police officer.

A police officer who tasered an elderly woman offered “malleable” explanations about what happened in the lead-up to the deadly incident and spurred him to act, a jury has heard.

Dramatic footage of the incident taken from the nursing home’s CCTV and police bodyworn cameras has been shown at a NSW Supreme Court manslaughter trial for Senior Constable Kristian White.

In the clips, the 34-year-old officer was heard saying “nah, bugger it” before shooting 95-year-old Clare Nowland in the torso with the electrical barbs.

Sign up to The Nightly's newsletters.

Get the first look at the digital newspaper, curated daily stories and breaking headlines delivered to your inbox.

Email Us
By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

“What the accused said before he fired the Taser was completely inconsistent with it being to prevent an imminent violent confrontation,” crown prosecutor Brett Hatfield SC told the jury on Tuesday during closing submissions.

“’Nah, bugger it’. You might understand that to mean he was fed up, impatient, not prepared to wait any longer.”

White discharged his stun gun at Mrs Nowland in a treatment room at Yallambee Lodge aged-care home in the southern NSW town of Cooma during the early hours of May 17, 2023.

The great-grandmother, who had symptoms of dementia and was holding a steak knife at the time, fell backwards and hit her head before dying a week later in hospital.

Kristian White (file image)
Kristian White's stun gun use was inconsistent with preventing imminent violence, a prosecutor said. Credit: Bianca De Marchi/AAP

White argued he was justified in firing the weapon despite only one minute passing after he encountered her in the treatment room.

He claimed he needed to protect others in the area from injury.

But no reasonable person would have thought a violent confrontation was imminent because of Mrs Nowland’s speed as it took her one minute to slowly shuffle forward a metre before she was tasered, Mr Hatfield said.

She was also two or three metres away from White, his police partner, two paramedics and a registered nurse.

“Who could she have injured at that moment? No one,” Mr Hatfield said.

The prosecutor targeted White’s credibility, saying he refused to answer straightforward questions about whether Mrs Nowland looked frail or moved slowly.

The officer also made a “complete about-face” when asked about the precise point in time he was prepared to fire the weapon and whether he thought the aged-care resident was going to act with superhuman strength, the jury heard.

“His answers were malleable and changing even within a few questions,” Mr Hatfield said.

A police officer claims his decision to taser a 95-year-old woman was "justified". Giving evidence at his own manslaughter trial.

Claims by White’s partner, acting Sergeant Jessica Pank, and paramedic Anna Hofner that Mrs Nowland posed a threat did not match video footage showing the elderly woman stationary inside the treatment room when she was tasered, he argued.

White’s police report that claimed the 95-year-old was waving the blade around and was holding a boning knife did not match video or documentary evidence, the jury heard.

The officer has been accused of manslaughter through criminal negligence by breaching the duty of care owed to Mrs Nowland, and by committing an unlawful and dangerous act.

Jurors will have to consider whether the use of force was reasonable or not.

They will not have to determine whether the tasering was a breach of police policies or procedures.

“You might think in this case that it plainly was but that’s not the issue here,” Mr Hatfield said.

The trial continues.

Latest Edition

The Nightly cover for 19-11-2024

Latest Edition

Edition Edition 19 November 202419 November 2024

More Australians believe our immigration intake is leaving them poorer, more miserable and locked out of the housing market.