Theodoros Tsalkos: Accused 'sadistic' rapist to face fresh trial in Melbourne over alleged 1987 St Kilda rapes

Emily Woods
AAP
A man jailed over historical rapes of two teenage sex workers has had his convictions set aside. (James Ross/AAP PHOTOS)
A man jailed over historical rapes of two teenage sex workers has had his convictions set aside. (James Ross/AAP PHOTOS) Credit: AAP

A man who allegedly posed as a cop to rape two teenage sex workers more than 36 years ago has had his convictions set aside and will face a fresh trial.

Theodoros Tsalkos was found guilty of kidnapping, rape and gross indecency by a jury and in 2023 he was sentenced to up to 13 years and six months in jail.

He was aged 25 in 1987 when he was accused of pretending to be an undercover police officer to pick up two sex workers, who were aged 15 and 16, in St Kilda.

Sign up to The Nightly's newsletters.

Get the first look at the digital newspaper, curated daily stories and breaking headlines delivered to your inbox.

Email Us
By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

It took more than three decades for Tsalkos to face trial, in 2022, where he was accused of holding the girls captive in his car and raping them over several hours.

County Court Judge Rosemary Carlin told Tsalkos “what you did was pure evil”, and labelled the alleged crimes as “sadistic and vile” as she handed him an eight-year and two-month minimum jail term.

Tsalkos, now aged in his 60s, appealed against his convictions on several grounds, including that a miscarriage of justice occurred during the jury’s directions.

He claimed the jury was not warned that a mother’s evidence of one of the victim’s distress carried little weight, when jurors were invited to use it as “independent” evidence in their decision.

The Court of Appeal on Thursday, by a majority, found the judge had misdirected the jury and set aside his convictions, ordering a new trial

“We have concluded a substantial miscarriage of justice occurred,” Justices Karin Emerton, Stephen McLeish and Christopher Boyce said.

“We would grant leave to appeal against conviction; allow the appeal; set aside the applicant’s convictions; and order a new trial.”

In a separate decision, Justice Phillip Priest disagreed with his fellow judges on a second appeal ground and found it should also succeed.

This ground concerned failings by defence and prosecutors during the jury trial around credibility and issues in the prosecution’s closing address.

1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)

National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028

Latest Edition

The Nightly cover for 19-12-2024

Latest Edition

Edition Edition 19 December 202419 December 2024

Federal Reserve’s rate cut and inflation predictions shatter hopes of Aussie mortgage relief.