THE NEW YORK TIMES: Why Xi Jinping Is Going to North Korea to Court Kim Jong Un

THE NEW YORK TIMES: The last time China’s top leader, Xi Jinping, travelled to North Korea, that country’s dictator, Kim Jong Un, was reeling from sanctions and failed nuclear talks with the United States.

David Pierson and Choe Sang-Hun
The New York Times
The last time China’s top leader, Xi Jinping, traveled to North Korea in 2018, that country’s dictator, Kim Jong Un, was reeling from sanctions and failed nuclear talks with the United States.
The last time China’s top leader, Xi Jinping, traveled to North Korea in 2018, that country’s dictator, Kim Jong Un, was reeling from sanctions and failed nuclear talks with the United States. Credit: Ju Peng/AP

The last time China’s top leader, Xi Jinping, traveled to North Korea, that country’s dictator, Kim Jong Un, was reeling from sanctions and failed nuclear talks with the United States.

Now, nearly seven years later, as Xi returns to North Korea on Monday, he will meet with a leader who is newly emboldened by an alliance with Russia that has helped his economy break out of isolation.

Xi is expected to use the two-day summit with Kim to project a united front between allies against the West. But analysts say China is likely also keen to assert its influence over a neighbor that has leaned toward Russia. Kim, for his part, wants to be treated less like a junior partner to China and will likely use his new closeness to Russia to press China for economic concessions.

Sign up to The Nightly's newsletters.

Get the first look at the digital newspaper, curated daily stories and breaking headlines delivered to your inbox.

Email Us
By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

If North Korea is able to successfully balance its two giant neighbors, Kim might feel even less constrained about advancing his nuclear weapons program. That could destabilize a region where U.S. allies are already worried about China’s military buildup and Washington’s ability to honor its defense agreements as it depletes resources fighting a war with Iran.

Here’s what to know about the meeting.

Xi wants to signal unity, but will also have to court Kim.

Xi will likely use his rare access to Kim to remind the world that North Korea depends on China and that Beijing cannot be sidelined.

The messaging would align with efforts by Xi to project China as a superpower equal to the United States. China is keen to show that while Washington sows chaos — whether through its war with Iran or by imposing tariffs on allies and adversaries alike — China is a stabilizing force in the world. This point was reinforced in Xi’s recent summits with President Donald Trump, then Russian President Vladimir Putin, in Beijing.

“Xi is attempting to demonstrate that he is on better terms with members of his authoritarian clique than President Trump is with his democratic partners,” said Kurt Campbell, a former deputy secretary of state under President Joe Biden and the chair of the Asia Group.

But Xi’s decision to make a rare trip abroad also underscores his need to court Kim.

North Korea has eased its dependence on China by reviving a Cold War-era mutual defense pledge with Moscow in 2024. Russia has provided North Korea with badly needed oil, food and weapons technology in exchange for North Korean troops and munitions for its war in Ukraine. That has created a headache for China, which wants to maintain its influence over North Korea to rein in its volatile behavior and ensure stability on its borders.

“There is no question that the Chinese are worried about how close the North Korean-Russian relationship is getting,” said John Delury, a historian of Northeast Asia who is a senior fellow in Seoul, South Korea, for the Asia Society. “This trip helps head that off a bit and it’s a way for Xi to insert himself back into the equation.”

Kim is on a winning streak.

Things had looked bleak for Kim just a few years ago. First, Trump walked away from nuclear talks with him in 2019, dashing hopes that the United States would lift sanctions. The following year, Kim drove his country into isolation in response to COVID-19 by closing its borders. That froze trade with China, North Korea’s main source of goods and foreign currency.

Kim’s fortunes changed, not only as the pandemic eased, but after he seized on Russia’s difficulties in the war in Ukraine to strengthen ties with Moscow and recalibrate North Korea’s foreign policy, which had tilted heavily toward China. He supplied Moscow with weapons and troops, while Russia reciprocated by injecting billions of dollars’ worth of oil, food, weapons technology and other aid into North Korea.

Xi may seek to remind Kim that China remains North Korea’s main benefactor. In March, China restored train services and flights between Beijing and Pyongyang.

Still, Kim wants more. Tourism is one of the few sectors not restricted by U.N. sanctions, and the North Korean leader has invested in seafront resorts and mountain hot springs with the aim of attracting Chinese visitors.

“North Korea is no longer a pathetic nation clinging to a single patron,” said Lee Byong-chul, an analyst at the Institute for Far Eastern Studies in Seoul. “It has found a new strategic wing in Russia, in addition to China, which has long been its lifeline.”

Trump and nuclear weapons loom over the summit.

One question hanging over the summit is what, if any, pressure Xi will put on Kim to engage with the United States. Since returning to the White House, the American president has repeatedly signaled his desire for another summit with Kim.

If North Korea is able to successfully balance its two giant neighbors, Kim might feel even less constrained about advancing his nuclear weapons program.
If North Korea is able to successfully balance its two giant neighbors, Kim might feel even less constrained about advancing his nuclear weapons program. Credit: AP

It is possible that Trump has asked Xi to deliver a message while he is in Pyongyang. Kim, however, has remained steadfast, insisting he will reject any dialogue with Washington that places his country’s nuclear program on the negotiating table.

Kim has long treated that program as a way to reduce his reliance on Russia and China for security, and as a shield against a U.S. invasion. That view has been hardened by the Trump administration’s rationale that it attacked Iran partly to prevent it from developing nuclear weapons.

Kim’s defiance highlights a major shift in how the world’s biggest powers handle North Korea.

For years, China and Russia shared Washington’s goal of rolling back North Korea’s nuclear program, voting with the United States when the U.N. Security Council imposed sweeping sanctions on Pyongyang in 2016 and 2017.

But two years ago, Putin appeared to provide tacit approval of the nuclear weapons program when he signed the defense pact and offered Russia’s military technical assistance.

“Pyongyang has the right to take reasonable measures to strengthen its own defense capability,” the Russian leader said.

North Korea is estimated to already possess 50 warheads, but still seeks advanced technology to build intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of delivering those weapons.

China officially opposes a nuclear North Korean state, concerned it would drive U.S. allies such as South Korea to seek their own nuclear arsenals. But its stance has recently evolved to reflect a desire for better relations with North Korea and a growing view that a nuclear-armed North Korea provides leverage over the United States and South Korea, analysts said.

When Xi and Kim met in Beijing last September, official statements from both governments omitted any mention of removing nuclear weapons from the Korean Peninsula, which had been standard boilerplate for years.

China may see little geopolitical value in helping Trump manage the North Korean nuclear threat, and may also consider it impossible to force North Korea to give up its nuclear program without damaging ties.

Last month, the White House announced that Trump and Xi “confirmed their shared goal to denuclearize North Korea.” But the Chinese government offered a more muted readout, stating only that they had “exchanged views” on the Korean Peninsula.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

© 2026 The New York Times Company

Originally published on The New York Times

Comments

Latest Edition

The Nightly cover for 05-06-2026

Latest Edition

Edition Edition 5 June 20265 June 2026

Pauline Hanson is riding a fresh wave of support. Did she change or did the rest of the country ‘catch up’?