THE NEW YORK TIMES: Trump plans to impose tariffs a different way after supreme court loss
President Donald Trump announced Friday that he would impose a new, across-the-board 10 per cent tariff on US trading partners.
President Donald Trump announced Friday that he would impose a new, across-the-board 10 per cent tariff on US trading partners, part of a series of steps meant to preserve his trade war now that the Supreme Court has declared many of his most punishing duties illegal.
Striking a defiant note even in legal defeat, Trump asserted at a news conference that he remained unbowed and would take advantage of other federal laws in a bid to duplicate the steep taxes on imports that the justices have invalidated.
For one thing, Trump said he would invoke a portion of law known as Section 122, which no president has ever used, to impose a 10 per cent global tariff starting in a matter of days.
Sign up to The Nightly's newsletters.
Get the first look at the digital newspaper, curated daily stories and breaking headlines delivered to your inbox.
By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.Separately, the president said he would use a second set of authorities, called Section 301, to open investigations into certain, unspecified countries’ unfair trade practices.
Together, Trump tried to frame the actions as a close substitute for his emergency tariffs, which he enacted under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, known as IEEPA. He used that law because he believed it afforded him flexibility to impose and lift steep duties, instantly and without Congress, in ways that pressured other countries into accepting US demands.
To that end, the two sets of authorities that Trump said he would invoke Friday carry much different, and clearer, limits on their use.
The forthcoming 10 per cent tariff may be in place for only 150 days, unless lawmakers approve an extension. It is legally untested, but the law affords the power for the president to address issues including a widening trade deficit.
The investigations into unfair trade practices may also take time, perhaps delaying the administration’s efforts to reimpose steep import taxes. It is more legally settled, and the president has used it since his first term, particularly to impose duties on China.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
© 2026 The New York Times Company
Originally published on The New York Times
