Love advice: We get too much of it, an article from Raoul de Roussy de Sales in 1938 is what we need to know

Renée Onque
CNBC
Lovers seek relationship advice from books, podcasts and friends, but they might actually be hurting their chances of having a happy relationship. This might be the only advice you need to know.
Lovers seek relationship advice from books, podcasts and friends, but they might actually be hurting their chances of having a happy relationship. This might be the only advice you need to know. Credit: The Nightly

I hope I don’t offend the “real lovers” by saying this, but I’m a bit worried we’re getting fed too many opinions and too much advice about dating, relationships and romantic love.

Scrolling down my timeline on X, formerly known as Twitter, it seems like every other tweet is an anecdote, how-to, or horror story about love. And as a frequent reader of romance novels — a business that is booming by the way — I’m overwhelmed. I can’t be the only one.

The fixation on love isn’t new.

Sign up to The Nightly's newsletters.

Get the first look at the digital newspaper, curated daily stories and breaking headlines delivered to your inbox.

Email Us
By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

Humans are “wired as organisms to bond to a partner, and that’s why love and relationships and matters of the heart are so fundamentally important for all of us,” according to marriage and family therapist Lisa Marie Bobby.

It’s normal and can be helpful to seek advice about how to grow as an individual and be a more supportive partner in romantic relationships, Ms Bobby said.

But when anyone can share love advice despite their credentials, “there is a high degree of variability in the quality and the trustworthiness of the advice that people receive,” especially on social media platforms, she said.

This may be causing a problem, very similar to one that French journalist Raoul de Roussy de Sales wrote about in 1938: we’re too consumed by the idea of having the “perfect” relationship.

I stumbled on Mr De Roussy De Sales’ article, “Love in America,” when digging through The Atlantic Archive; I’m a lover of history and enjoy finding parallels between the past and the present.

As a disclaimer, Mr De Roussy De Sales’ piece is gender-specific and attributes certain characteristics solely to women and others to men. It cannot be overstated how different cultural norms were in 1938 compared to now.

“Women did not have full privileges as humans without being connected to a man through marriage. And so that contextual, cultural piece of it needs to be understood because the life trajectory of an unmarried woman in that day and time was very different than that of a married woman,” Ms Bobby said.

Yet, there are some similarities in some of Mr De Roussy De Sales’ observations from 86 years ago, and what experts are seeing play out in the present day.

In his article, written in May of 1938, he detailed his concern with how much Americans were focused on the concept of a romantic love without flaws, noting that many seemed to be abandoning relationships at the sight of any real conflict.

couple, romantic, together
couple, romantic, together Credit: LollipopPhotographyUK/Pixabay (user LollipopPhotographyUK)

In “Love in America,” Mr De Roussy De Sales wrote:

“Thus the problem of love in America seems to be the result of conflicting and rather unrealistic ways of approaching it. Too many songs, too many stories, too many pictures, and too much romance on the one hand, and too much practical advice on the other.“

Mr De Roussy De Sales’ worry at the time was that fairytale-like depictions of love from songs and novels paired with books on cookie-cutter ways to approach issues in relationships, could actually be harmful and leave “little room for compromise”.

He noticed that fictional representations of love were causing people to believe that “love is always wholesome, genuine, uplifting, and fresh,” and “when, for some reason or other, it fails to keep you uplifted, wholesome, and fresh, the only thing to do is to begin all over again with another partner.”

And with the rise in books about how to maintain the perfect marriage being published at the time, Mr De Roussy De Sales wrote, “You cannot possibly feel cheerful when you see the art of love . . . reduced to such automatic formulas”.

It’s a complicated conundrum, Ms Bobby said, because “it is a fantastic idea to try to educate yourself about how healthy relationships work, and do some work,” on yourself but “anytime any of us substitute the judgment of other people for our own judgment and experience of reality, we can run into problems.”

Essentially, there is no play-by-play for love, Mr De Roussy De Sales explained, and a hyper-fixation on it could lead to negative outcomes. And Bobby agrees.

When coming from a trusted source like an authentic relationship expert, love advice can be positive, especially “if it’s connected to you and your reality and sensitive to the fact that everybody’s different. Everybody’s coming from a different context, living in a different context, and there’s no cookie for the cutter,” Bobby says.

“What does become a problem is when people are listening to these messages about what relationships should be, or what people should be doing or should not be doing, that are very black and white, that are said with a lot of confidence, from people who often aren’t coming from this evidence-based approach.”

There’s also the issue of the belief that finding your romantic counterpart will solve all of your life’s problems, which Mr De Roussy De Sales recognised nearly a century ago.

He feared that an overreliance on examples of love and advice about it stemmed from individuals wishing to be “helped to solve certain difficulties” instead of accepting “the idea that maladjustments and misunderstandings are not only normal but bearable once you have made up your mind that, whatever may be the ultimate aim of our earthly existence, perfect happiness through love or any other form of expression is not part of the programme.”

If you strongly desire to be partnered or start a family, Bobby encourages you to not downplay your wants or degrade yourself. She just warns that you don’t assume attaining those desires will make you happier or more fulfilled.

“That is false. You are going to feel about as happy as you feel right now and as fulfilled as you feel right now, whether or not you have a partner or a house or a baby,” Ms Bobby said. “Honour and respect that they’re our very real and legitimate desires, that people are, again, hard-wired to have.”

It’s important to decide what your values are in life, whether it be family or serving your community, in addition to your desires for love, she said. Working with a life coach can be a great support if you don’t know where to start, she adds.

Ask yourself, “What is it that I desire in the future and what am I experiencing?” Ms Bobby said.

“The answer to this question is very individual in nature, and it requires a lot of self-awareness and deep digging to think about.”

This article was originally published at cnbc.com.

Latest Edition

The front page of The Nightly for 19-09-2024

Latest Edition

Edition Edition 19 September 202419 September 2024

ALP can’t decry the Greens’ support of Hamas and rioters while still chasing their votes, writes Cameron Milner.