AFL grand final: Peter Bell slams AFL for treating ‘footy fans like fools’ over Lachie Neale ‘charade’

Former Fremantle captain Peter Bell has condemned Lachie Neale’s ‘predictable’ tribunal outcome after the Lions star was cleared to play in the grand final, saying the AFL has treated ‘fans like fools’.

Headshot of Fraser Williams
Fraser Williams
PerthNow
Dockers fans heavily outnumbered Lions fans as players took part in the AFL grand final parade in Melbourne.

Former Fremantle captain Peter Bell has condemned Lachie Neale’s “predictable” tribunal outcome after the Lions star was cleared to play in the grand final, saying the AFL has treated “fans like fools”.

Neale was handed a one-match ban for gut-punching Hawthorn’s Jack Ginnivan during Brisbane’s preliminary final win on Saturday, a decision that was upheld at Tuesday’s marathon four-and-a-half hour tribunal.

The suspension was taken to the appeals board on Thursday, which sensationally downgraded the ban to a $10,000 fine after more than two-and-a-half hours of deliberation, leaving the two-time Brownlow medallist free to play.

Sign up to The Nightly's newsletters.

Get the first look at the digital newspaper, curated daily stories and breaking headlines delivered to your inbox.

Email Us
By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

The decision left a sour taste in Bell’s mouth, who called out the result for being “entirely predictable”.

“I’d just rather we do without the rigmarole and all the charade, and we just have ‘we don’t think he should miss a grand final for this’,” Bell said on SEN. “Because that’s what it is really.”

During Thursday’s appeal, Brisbane’s lawyer Adrian Anderson argued that Neale should not have been suspended under “exceptional and compelling circumstances” given his clean record over 320 games.

A point that appeals board chairperson Richard Loveridge agreed with when downgrading the ban into a fine.

“What error of law was there that one tribunal or one panel don’t take into account exemplary record enough?,” Bell argued.

“To my way of thinking, that’s not really an error of law, that’s just subjective discretion.

“The appeal was you didn’t consider (the exemplary circumstances) enough . . . that’s not an error of law, that’s just one panel having a different opinion to the other.

Bell acknowledged that he doesn’t have issue with Neale playing on the big stage, but he does have a problem with the AFL’s handling of the situation, saying the league treats fans like fools.

“I don’t have a problem with it, really, just call it what it is - ‘we don’t want him to miss a grand final for that strike’.”

“I don’t mind him playing, in some ways it might be a good thing, I just feel like they treat the general public and footy fans like fools,” he said.

Comments

Latest Edition

The Nightly cover for 24-09-2026

Latest Edition

Edition Edition 24 September 202624 September 2026

How the Medicare hack heralds a new age of super intelligence - whether we’re ready or not.