Luke Sayers and wife Cate’s legal battle over d**k pic scandal to remain in Victorian Supreme Court

A decision has been made on whether the legal battle between former Carlton boss Luke Sayers and his estranged wife Cate will remain in the public eye.

Liam Beatty
NewsWire
Legal action between Cate Sayers and her husband Luke Sayers will remain in the Supreme Court. Josie Hayden
Legal action between Cate Sayers and her husband Luke Sayers will remain in the Supreme Court. Josie Hayden Credit: News Corp Australia

A defamation case brought by former Carlton boss Luke Sayers’ estranged wife Cate Sayers against her husband will remain in the public eye following a judge’s ruling.

Mrs Sayers is suing her husband alleging he defamed her by pointing the finger at her in an internal AFL inquiry after a d--k pic was posted to Mr Sayers’ X account in January.

The photo was deleted about 15 minutes later, with Mr Sayers’ account posting’ “sorry my account has been hacked — please ignore all posts”.

Sign up to The Nightly's newsletters.

Get the first look at the digital newspaper, curated daily stories and breaking headlines delivered to your inbox.

Email Us
By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.
Cate Sayers (right) outside of court with her lawyer Sue Chrysanthou. Picture: NewsWire / David Caird
Cate Sayers (right) outside of court with her lawyer Sue Chrysanthou. NewsWire / David Caird Credit: News Corp Australia
Luke Sayers did not attend court last month. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman
Luke Sayers did not attend court last month. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia

She denies posting the picture, claiming she wasn’t staying in the same hotel as her husband at the time it was posted.

Last month, Mr Sayers launched a legal bid in the Victorian Supreme Court seeking to have the case moved to the Family Court of Australia — a move that would have impacted media coverage of the trial due to legal restrictions.

Ms Sayers opposed the move, arguing if the case was moved she may not be able to be publicly vindicated.

The Game NRL 2026

In a judgment handed down on Wednesday morning by Supreme Court judge Andrew Watson, he found it was not in the interest of justice to transfer the proceeding.

“I have determined that, having regard to the interests of justice, it is not ‘more appropriate’ that the proceeding in this Court be determined by the Family Court,” he wrote.

“Cate submitted, and I accept, that an important function of the tort of defamation is the capacity it provides to a successful plaintiff to vindicate their reputation.”

Latest Edition

The Nightly cover for 03-06-2026

Latest Edition

Edition Edition 3 June 20263 June 2026

Jim Chalmers says weak growth and plunging productivity is a ‘very solid’ result and ‘business investment is booming’.