James Crumbley found guilty of manslaughter over son Ethan’s school shooting rampage

A Michigan jury has convicted the father of a teenager who shot four classmates dead at a US high school of manslaughter after prosecutors argued he bore responsibility because he and his wife gave their son a gun and ignored warning signs of violence.

James Crumbley, 47, was found guilty in his trial carried out a month after his wife, Jennifer Crumbley, was found guilty on manslaughter charges stemming from the shooting.

James Crumbley faced four counts of involuntary manslaughter, one for each of the victims at Oxford High School, near Detroit, in the 2021 shootings. Jurors began deliberating on Wednesday.

The Crumbleys’ son, Ethan, was 15 at the time of the shooting at Oxford High School involving a semi-automatic handgun. He pleaded guilty in 2022 to four counts of first-degree murder and other charges and was sentenced to life in prison without parole in December.

The United States, a country with persistent gun violence, has experienced a series of school shootings over the years, often carried out by current or former students. The Crumbleys were the first parents to be charged with manslaughter in a child’s school shooting.

“This is a very egregious and rare, rare set of facts,” Oakland County, Michigan, prosecutor Karen McDonald told the jury during closing arguments on Wednesday.

Ms McDonald said James Crumbley repeatedly ignored warning signs that his son was deeply disturbed, did not get him the help he needed, and did not do enough to safely store the firearm in the family home.

“He did nothing over and over and over again,” Ms McDonald said.

Ms McDonald also presented the jury with texts that Ethan Crumbley had sent to a friend and journal entries he had written in the months leading up to the shooting, in which he talked about wanting medical attention and hearing voices, but he was worried his parent would be “pissed.”

On one occasion, according to a text message to a friend, Ms McDonald said that Ethan had asked James Crumbley to take him to the doctor, but his dad “gave me some pills and told me to suck it up”.

Defence lawyer Mariell Lehman argued that James Crumbley could not have possibly foreseen that his son would carry out a mass shooting.

“James had no idea that his son was having a hard time,” Ms Lehman told jurors during her closing argument, saying no evidence had been presented that James knew the contents of his son’s text messages or journal.

Gun safety experts have said they hope the Crumbley trials serve as a wake-up call for parents to better secure weapons in their homes. About 75 per cent of school shooters obtained the guns used in attacks from their own homes, according to government research.

According to prosecutors, James Crumbley purchased the handgun used in the attack four days before the November 30, 2021, shootings. On the morning of the shootings, a teacher discovered drawings by Ethan Crumbley that depicted a handgun, a bullet and a bleeding figure next to the words “Blood everywhere,” “My life is useless,” and “The thoughts won’t stop - help me.”

The Crumbleys, summoned to the school that morning, were told that Ethan needed counselling and they needed to take him home, according to prosecutors. But the couple resisted taking their son home and did not search his backpack or ask him about the gun, prosecutors said.

Both of the Crumbleys challenged that account in their trials, saying that teachers in the meeting mutually agreed that Ethan could remain in school that day, and that at no point did they think he posed a danger to fellow students.

Ethan Crumbley was returned to class and later walked out of a bathroom with the gun and began firing, according to prosecutors.

Jennifer Crumbley faces an April 9 sentencing date.