Australian news and politics recap: Jim Chalmers and Angus Taylor face off in tetchy treasurers’ debate

David Johns, Elisia Seeber and Max Corstorphan
The Nightly
Treasurers debate: Jim Chalmers and Angus Taylor.
Treasurers debate: Jim Chalmers and Angus Taylor. Credit: Sky News/Supplied

Scroll down for the latest news and updates.

Key Events

Wrapping up
Top take aways from the treasurers’ debate
Final arguments: Taylor
Final arguments: Chalmers
Chalmers: We won’t form minority government with Greens
Taylor grilled on ‘hiding’ energy price rise
Chalmers grilled on decade of deficits
What will you do to make Australia more competitive?
Greenwood gets personal with Taylor
Greenwood gets personal with Chalmers
Chalmers asked to apologise for breaking energy price promise
Taylor: $50m food charity pledge will help people who need it most
We’re onto the cost of living now
Mediscare rolled out again
Taylor bats away questions on cuts
‘Nonsense’: Taylor fires off first broadside of debate
Who is best placed to take on Trump tariffs?
Angus Taylor’s turn
Jim Chalmers pitches first
Chalmers, Taylor to square off in treasurers’ debate
Tony Abbott campaigning in WA
Albo lashes Angus Taylor: ‘I’m surprised he’s making another appearance’
Labor candidate for Leichhardt leaves PM in shade - literally
Albo: ‘We won’t negotiate with the Greens’
Albanese fires up over Greens and negative gearing question
Labor promises to rebuild the Barron River Bridge
Adam Bandt pitches housing reform if Greens hold balance of power
‘Ludicrous’: Michaelia Cash hits out at calls for Jacinta Price to be dropped from event
Trump’s new drug tariff to hit Australia hard
Dutton shares toll of campaign trail in the wake of dad’s heart attack
Greens call to dump negative gearing
Bandt v the billionaires
Greens leader makes election pitch at Press Club
Dutton spruiks energy discount for consumers but can’t say when
Dutton says he’d do better at relationship with Trump amid new tariffs
Dutton says his dad is a ‘tough bugger’ amid health scare
Albo refuses to disclose if he’s spoken to Trump directly about tariffs
NSW Premier doubles down on WFH
PM denies Dutton’s WFH policy is the same as NSW Premier’s
Albo responds to fiery debate in US senate over Aussie tariffs
Albo pays tribute to family’s enormous contribution to Sydney
Women candidates face huge disadvantage in unwinnable seats
What’s planned for day 12 of the Federal election campaign
Leading US Senator slams ‘insulting’ tariffs on Australia
Dutton says dad ‘will be ok’ but had considered dropping out of the debate
Dutton falls short of landing his key message
Albanese wins debate with ‘confident’ and ‘arrogant’ performance

Greenwood gets personal with Chalmers

He asks Jim Chalmers about criticism that while he is a very hard worker, he has “a bit of sa glass jaw” and that he doesn’t cop criticism well.

“I think over time, I’ve learned to understand that you take the good with the bad, and I try,” Dr Chalmers says.

“I think everyone gets grumpy sometimes, but I don’t think I get grumpy about that necessarily. I think I’ve learned over time to focus on the objective observers of the job that I’m doing. And I think ultimately the Australian people will judge that, all right, rather than the kind of partisan commentators from time to time on the opinion pages.”

Chalmers asked to apologise for breaking energy price promise

Greenwood challenges Dr Chalmers to apologise for his Government’s ill-fated promise to keep energy bills down.

“Will you apologise to the people of Australia tonight with your government having said that energy prices will come down by $275 when, in actual fact, average prices are at least $500 more than what they were at that time?”

I’ll save you the big long answer but the short one is: No.

Taylor: $50m food charity pledge will help people who need it most

This was an interesting plank of Peter Dutton’s Budget reply - that the Coalition would donate $50 million to critical food charities if elected.

“We’ve put $50 million into food banks, because we’re seeing families with mortgages, double income families in some cases, who can’t put food on the table.

“That’s the harsh reality of Labor’s homegrown inflation and Labor’s cost of living crisis.”

The food charity pledge is a real point of difference between the two parties. It’s a shame Labor hasn’t seen fit to match it.

We’re onto the cost of living now

They’ve started by cutting to interviews they’ve done with people on the streets, who are talking about how much they’re hurting financially right now.

Greenwood asks if the Albanese Government’s Budget was enough to win votes or if it was enough to help people with the cost of living.

“This is a very coherent strategy to help people with the cost of living,” Dr Chalmers says.

“Is it enough?” asks Greenwood.

Well, it’s it’s more than what our opponents are proposing.”

Mediscare rolled out again

Dr Chalmers tries to suggest the only way the Coalition can pay for its nuclear energy plan is with cuts to Medicare.

The Coalition has repeatedly committed to matching Labor’s future investment in Medicare.

But let’s not let the facts get in the way of a good story.

Taylor bats away questions on cuts

The shadow treasurer is asked about whether a Coalition government would make deeper cuts to the economy.

Instead he tries to talk about investment, pointing to the fact that investment as a percentage of GDP is at its lowest since the 1990s.

But Dr Chalmers and Greenwood keep trying to bring him back on track.

“If you get investment moving, you can keep the economy moving. And here’s the key, Ross, the way to manage a Budget is to grow the economy faster than you spend.

“It’s a simple rule. It’s one we had in place when we were in government. Jim hasn’t stuck to that. He threw it out the window.”

‘Nonsense’: Taylor fires off first broadside of debate

“Can I just start with some nonsense we’ve heard from Jim?” asks Mr Taylor.

“I mean, he started from the point of view of saying that there’s been meaningful growth in the economy, GDP per capita has gone backwards for 21 months in a row, under your so called stewardship.”

It’s a pretty tame insult, but it’s something. Now we just need some raised voices.

Who is best placed to take on Trump tariffs?

Chalmers is asked if the Albanese Govenrment has done enough to prevent Australia from being whacked with tariffs.

He says the government has done heaps, and Australia was hit with the least bad tariffs of anyone.

Mr Taylor says the Coalition has stood up to Trump when it was previously in government.

So, both of them are good enough. According to them.

Chalmers promises the debate will be respectful

You can almost hear the disappointment in Ross Greenwood’s voice.

Angus Taylor’s turn

“We are living in uncertain and tumultuous times, and the choice at this election is, who do you trust to manage the economy?” Mr Taylor asks.

“The context for it is that Australians are worse off than they were just three years ago, as they dig deep into their savings, as they work harder for less, and as they cut back on essential spending. Now Labor promised the world.

“They promised lower electricity prices. They promised lower mortgage mortgage costs. They promised a lower cost of living and easier lives. The reality has been different. Prices are up, debt is up, deficits are up, spending is up, taxes are up, but the one thing that is down and has collapsed is the Australian standard of living which has fallen more than ever before in history, more than any of our peer countries around the world.

“Now there is an alternative, a better plan to get this country back on track, to beat inflation, to boost growth, to back small business, to fix our housing and energy markets and to provide immediate relief at the bowser as we fix our budget to ensure that we protect our nation for the future. “

Comments

Latest Edition

The Nightly cover for 11-04-2025

Latest Edition

Edition Edition 11 April 202511 April 2025

Trusting Trump, trade turnarounds and the future of AUKUS. Anthony Albanese’s exclusive sit-down with Latika M Bourke.