Elon Musk: Pentagon to brief DOGE leader on top-secret United States-China potential war plan

The Pentagon is scheduled on Friday to brief Elon Musk on the US military’s plan for any war that might break out with China, two US officials said Thursday.

Another official said the briefing will be China focused, without providing additional details. A fourth official confirmed Mr Musk was to be at the Pentagon on Friday, but offered no details.

Providing Mr Musk access to some of the nation’s most closely guarded military secrets would be a dramatic expansion of his already extensive role as an adviser to US President Donald Trump and leader of his effort to slash spending and purge the government of people and policies they oppose.

It would also bring into sharp relief the questions about Mr Musk’s conflicts of interest as he ranges widely across the federal bureaucracy while continuing to run businesses that are major government contractors.

In this case, Mr Musk, the billionaire chief executive of both SpaceX and Tesla, is a leading supplier to the Pentagon and has extensive financial interests in China.

Pentagon war plans, known in military jargon as O-plans or operational plans, are among the military’s most closely guarded secrets. If a foreign country was to learn how the United States planned to fight a war against them, it could reinforce its defences and address its weaknesses, making the plans far less likely to succeed.

The top-secret briefing for the China war plan has about 20 to 30 slides that lay out how the United States would fight such a conflict. It covers the plan beginning with the indications and warning of a threat from China to various options on what Chinese targets to hit, over what time period, that would be presented to Mr Trump for decisions, according to officials with knowledge of the plan.

A White House spokesperson did not respond to an email seeking comment about the purpose of the visit, how it came about, whether Mr Trump was aware of it, and whether the visit raises questions of conflicts of interest.

The White House has not said whether Mr Trump signed a conflicts of interest waiver for Mr Musk.

After The New York Times published this article online, Sean Parnell, the chief Defence Department spokesperson, said in a statement: “The Defence Department is excited to welcome Elon Musk to the Pentagon on Friday. He was invited by Secretary Hegseth and is just visiting.”

The meeting reflects the extraordinary dual role played by Mr Musk, who is both the world’s wealthiest man and has been given broad authority by Mr Trump.

Mr Musk has a security clearance, and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth can determine who has a need to know about the plan. A choice of sharing lots of technical details with Mr Musk, however, is another matter.

Mr Hegseth; Adm. Christopher W. Grady, the acting chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and Adm. Samuel J. Paparo, the head of the military’s Indo-Pacific Command, are set to present Mr Musk with details on the US plan to counter China in the event of military conflict between the two countries, the officials said.

Operational plans for major contingencies, like a war with China, are extremely difficult for people without extensive military planning experience to understand. The technical nature is why presidents are typically presented with the broad contours of a plan, rather than the actual details of documents. How many details Mr Musk will want or need to hear is unclear.

Mr Hegseth received part of the China war plan briefing last week and another part Wednesday, according to officials familiar with the plan.

It was unclear what the impetus was for providing Mr Musk such a sensitive briefing. He is not in the military chain of command, nor is he an official adviser to Mr Trump on military matters involving China.

But there is a possible reason Mr Musk might need to know aspects of the war plan.

If Mr Musk and his team of cost cutters from the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, want to trim the Pentagon budget in a responsible way, they may need to know what weapons systems the Pentagon plans to use in a fight with China.

Take, for example, aircraft carriers. Cutting back on future aircraft carriers would save billions of dollars, money that could be spent on drones or other weaponry. But if the US war strategy relies on using aircraft carriers in innovative ways that would surprise China, mothballing existing ships or stopping production on future ships could cripple that plan.

Planning for a war with China has dominated Pentagon thinking for decades, well before a possible confrontation with Beijing became more conventional wisdom on Capitol Hill. The United States has built its Air Forces, Navy and Space Forces — and even more recently its Marines and Army forces — with a possible fight against China in mind.

Critics have said the military has invested too much in big expensive systems like fighter jets or aircraft carriers and too little in mid-range drones and coastal defences. But for Mr Musk to evaluate how to reorient Pentagon spending, he would want to know what the military intends to use and for what purpose.

Mr Musk has already called for the Pentagon to stop buying certain high-priced items like F-35 fighter jets, manufactured by one of his space-launch competitors, Lockheed Martin, in a program that costs the Pentagon more than $12 billion a year.

Yet Mr Musk’s extensive business interests make his access to strategic secrets about China a serious problem in the view of ethics experts.

Officials have said revisions to the war plans against China have focused on upgrading the plans for defending against space warfare. China has developed a suite of weapons that can attack US satellites.

Mr Musk’s constellations of low-earth orbit Starlink satellites, which provide data and communications services from space, are considered more resilient than traditional satellites. But he could have an interest in learning about whether or not the United States could defend his satellites in a war with China.

Participating in a classified briefing on the China threat with some of the most senior Pentagon and US military officials would be a tremendously valuable opportunity for any defence contractor seeking to sell services to the military.

Mr Musk could gain insight into new tools that the Pentagon might need and that SpaceX, where he remains the CEO, could sell.

Separately, Mr Musk has been the focus of an investigation by the Pentagon’s inspector general over questions about his compliance with his top-secret security clearance.

The investigations started last year after some SpaceX employees complained to government agencies that Musk and others at SpaceX were not properly reporting contacts or conversations with foreign leaders.

Air Force officials, before the end of the Biden administration, started their own review, after Senate Democrats asked questions about Mr Musk and asserted that he was not complying with security clearance requirements.

The Air Force, in fact, had denied a request by Mr Musk for an even higher level of security clearance, known as Special Access Program, which is reserved for extremely sensitive classified programs, citing potential security risks associated with the billionaire.

SpaceX has become so valuable to the Pentagon that the Chinese government has said it considers the company to be an extension of the US military.

“Starlink Militarization and Its Impact on Global Strategic Stability” was the headline of one publication released last year from China’s National University of Defence Technology, according to a translation of the paper prepared by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies.

Mr Musk and Tesla, an electric vehicle company he controls, are heavily reliant on China, which houses one of the automaker’s flagship factories in Shanghai.

Unveiled in 2019, the state-of-the-art facility was built with special permission from the Chinese government, and now accounts for more than half of Tesla’s global deliveries. Last year, the company said in financial filings that it had a $2.8 billion loan agreement with lenders in China for production expenditures.

In public, Mr Musk has avoided criticising Beijing and signalled his willingness to work with the Chinese Communist Party. In 2022, he wrote a column for the magazine of the Cyberspace Administration of China, the country’s censorship agency, trumpeting his companies and their missions of improving humanity.

That same year, the billionaire told The Financial Times that China should be given some control over Taiwan by making a “special administrative zone for Taiwan that is reasonably palatable,” an assertion that angered politicians of the independent island. In that same interview, he also noted that Beijing sought assurances that he would not sell Starlink in China.

The following year at a tech conference, Mr Musk called the democratic island “an integral part of China that is arbitrarily not part of China,” and compared the Taiwan-China situation to Hawaii and the United States.

On X, the social platform he owns, Mr Musk has long used his account to praise China. He has said the country is “by far” the world leader in electric vehicles and solar power, and has commended its space program for being “far more advanced than people realise.” He has encouraged more people to visit the country, and posited openly about an “inevitable” Russia-China alliance.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

© 2025 The New York Times Company