Iran sparks fresh tensions by declaring the Strait of Hormuz closed as US says it’s open
Iran says the Strait of Hormuz is shut. The US says it isn’t. A former CIA officer explains why the dispute could still disrupt global trade.
Just days after signing a 60-day peace deal with the United States, Iran has sparked fresh tensions by declaring the Strait of Hormuz closed.
Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps announced the strategic waterway was shut and warned ships not to approach, citing Israeli strikes in Lebanon as a breach of commitments made under the peace agreement.
WATCH THE VIDEO ABOVE: Iran shuts Strait of Hormuz amid peace deal dispute
Sign up to The Nightly's newsletters.
Get the first look at the digital newspaper, curated daily stories and breaking headlines delivered to your inbox.
By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.However, US Central Command rejected the claim, insisting Iran does not control the Strait and that commercial traffic continues to flow through the route.
According to US officials, 55 merchant vessels transited the Strait on Saturday, transporting more than 17 million barrels of oil and other cargo to global markets.
Former CIA officer Mike Baker told Sunrise on Sunday the dispute highlighted a major challenge facing negotiators.
“The problem is that the US says that Iran doesn’t control the Strait… but it doesn’t matter because all Iran has to do, in a sense, to control the Strait is say it’s closed,” he said.
“That then creates this uncertainty within the shipping industry, the insurance industry, the cargo operators. And they don’t feel it’s worth the risk to push their vessels through the Strait.”
Baker said the disagreement demonstrated how Iran could still exert significant influence over one of the world’s busiest shipping routes, even without formally controlling it.
While the United States may be technically correct from a military perspective, he said Iran’s warnings were enough to create uncertainty among shipping companies, insurers and cargo operators.
The dispute comes as fighting continues in Lebanon, threatening another key pillar of the agreement.
A ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah was one of the conditions underpinning the broader 14-point deal between Washington and Tehran.
But Israeli strikes killed at least 10 people in Lebanon on Saturday, hours after the truce took effect.
Israel said it was responding to attacks launched by Hezbollah, while the Iran-backed militant group warned it would not allow Israel “freedom of movement” inside Lebanese territory.
Baker said the violence highlights the fragile nature of the agreement.
“Iran controls Hezbollah,” he said.
“Iran just is basically working for time. The regime still exists. They believe they’ve got the upper hand because they still exist.”
The ceasefire in Lebanon is a condition for the start of 60 days of negotiations between the United States and Iran aimed at resolving disputes over Tehran’s nuclear program and securing a more lasting regional settlement.
A high-level Iranian delegation has arrived in Switzerland for talks, while US Vice President JD Vance is travelling to the country in the hope of making progress on both the nuclear issue and the Lebanon ceasefire.
-with AAP
Originally published on 7NEWS
