No special treatment for Latrell in swearing saga: Abdo

Jasper Bruce
AAP
Latrell Mitchell has come under fire over his foul-mouthed post-game interview.
Latrell Mitchell has come under fire over his foul-mouthed post-game interview. Credit: Triple M

Andrew Abdo has denied giving Latrell Mitchell special treatment by meeting with the South Sydney fullback rather than imposing a sanction following his profane radio interview.

The NRL chief executive said it was “bold” to suggest the league was afraid to fine Mitchell for his comments, and that he “wouldn’t be doing his job” if he did not meet with star players regularly.

Mitchell raised eyebrows with a Triple M radio cross on Thursday night, saying “f***” four times and that he didn’t “care if I’m swearing” as he reflected on the Rabbitohs’ 28-18 loss to Brisbane.

Sign up to The Nightly's newsletters.

Get the first look at the digital newspaper, curated daily stories and breaking headlines delivered to your inbox.

Email Us
By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

The incident has drawn extra attention to an underperforming Rabbitohs side, with Mitchell’s teammates downplaying the severity of the comments when quizzed on Monday.

The NRL has been reluctant to sanction Mitchell, one of the game’s most marketable and high-profile players, with Abdo instead committing to meeting the Souths fullback.

Brisbane great Corey Parker questioned the tactic on radio on Monday, and Canterbury football boss Phil Gould also claimed that the fullback had become “bigger” than those in charge.

But Abdo rejected suggestions that Mitchell was being given preferential treatment by having a meeting organised.

“I think it’s important to note that I will always catch up with a player,” he said at the launch of the NRL’s Multicultural Round.

“There’s always been an open invitation to catch up with any player or official in the game from time to time on a range of matters.

“We have a number of high-profile players, and Latrell is one of them.

“He’s a role model, he’s a leader, and if there’s an opportunity to engage with him and work with him on a range of issues confronting the game, then I wouldn’t be doing my job if I wasn’t doing that.”

The criticism of Mitchell comes after he was also criticised for being outspoken on the Ezra Mam racial slur, using social media to heap pressure on the NRL to come down hard on Spencer Leniu.

South Sydney coach Jason Demetriou defended Latrell and Rabbitoh Cody Walker over their stances on racism last week.

“If you stand for nothing you fall for everything,” Demetriou said.

BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA - MARCH 14: Latrell Mitchell of the Rabbitohs makes a break during the round two NRL match between Brisbane Broncos and South Sydney Rabbitohs at Suncorp Stadium, on March 14, 2024, in Brisbane, Australia. (Photo by Chris Hyde/Getty Images)
Latrell Mitchell makes a break during the loss to the Broncos. Credit: Chris Hyde/Getty Images

Abdo bristled at suggestions the NRL was afraid to sanction Mitchell.

“That’s quite a bold statement to make and we’ve proven over the past that when a player breaches the rules and we believe it warrants a breach action, we take it,” he said.

“Equally, we’ve been accused of being too harsh on players.

“Everyone will have their view on that. I’m really comfortable with where this sits, and I’m comfortable with the action that we’re taking at the moment.”

Abdo was quick to highlight that fellow players Brandon Smith and Toby Rudolf were investigated and also not fined for their own controversial media comments in the past.

Smith repeatedly swore in an interview with the YKTR Podcast in 2021, and Rudolf caused a stir for saying he would buy “1000 beers” and “try and pull something” at a bar when he spoke to Fox Sports about a win that season.

“This is consistent with how we’ve dealt players before,” Abdo said.

Latest Edition

The front page of The Nightly for 06-09-2024

Latest Edition

Edition Edition 6 September 20246 September 2024

A baby scalded with coffee is the latest in a string of violent attacks against infants ... WHY?