Parents accused of starving ballerina daughter to face retrial following ‘miscarriage of justice’
A new court development has emerged in the case of two parents accused of starving their ballerina daughter to near death.
Two parents accused of starving their ballerina daughter to near death will face a retrial, after the Court of Appeal found the conduct of the trial judge amounted to a “miscarriage of justice”.
The Perth parents were jailed last year after they became the focus of authorities when the girl’s ballet teacher made a report about her childlike appearance.
The parents were each charged with two counts of engaging in conduct that caused their child to suffer.
Sign up to The Nightly's newsletters.
Get the first look at the digital newspaper, curated daily stories and breaking headlines delivered to your inbox.
By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.They were eventually forced to take their homeschooled girl to medical treatment after repeatedly providing authorities with excuses for her frail appearance.
Authorities were told by the couple their daughter was born premature, was two years younger than her actual age and had a vegan diet.
Doctors determined the 15-year old girl weighed the same as a nine-year old child, was severely malnourished and socially underdeveloped.
The parent’s appealed their convictions on the ground there was a miscarriage of justice as a result of the conduct of the trial judge and that the trial was unfair. They were granted bail in April.
The Court of Appeal agreed the trial was unfair, stating in its judgment that the mother became unwell in the second week of the trial and was refused an adjournment by Judge Linda Black despite having a doctor’s certificate deeming her unfit to attend court for two days.
“Not only did the learned trial judge refuse an adjournment application (which the State did not oppose), her Honour ordered that the trial continue in (her) physical absence,” the Judgement read.
During her absence, the mother was required to remain in another room, where she could not see and hear evidence remotely, but could not be seen by anyone other than the trial judge and could not be heard within the courtroom.
The court found her right to be present throughout the trial was not justified by any lawful exception and gave rise to a miscarriage of justice.
The court also found the judge intervened or interrupted evidence from the parents and was in stark contrast to any interventions in evidence from the prosecution witnesses.
