Jackie ‘O’ Henderson: Radio star sues ARN Media after contract terminated following Kyle Sandilands blowup

Jackie ‘O’ Henderson has launched legal action against her old employer after her contract was terminated following an on-air blowup with her co-star Kyle Sandilands. 

Headshot of Peta Rasdien
Peta Rasdien
The Nightly
Kyle Sandilands turned up the drama as he began an $85 million legal fight over his sacking after an on-air bust-up with co-host Jackie O.

Jackie ‘O’ Henderson has launched a multi-million-dollar legal action against her old employer after her contract was terminated following an on-air blowup with co-star Kyle Sandilands.

ARN Media confirmed the legal proceedings had been filed in the Federal Court against Commonwealth Broadcasting Corporation, a subsidiary of ARN, in a statement to the ASX on Tuesday morning.

Henderson is seeking a settlement of more than $82 million.

Sign up to The Nightly's newsletters.

Get the first look at the digital newspaper, curated daily stories and breaking headlines delivered to your inbox.

Email Us
By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

The action comes hot on the heels of Sandilands launching his own legal action after his $100m contract was torn up. His case got its first hearing in the Federal Court last week.

ARN is the parent company of KIIS FM, which broadcast the wildly popular Kyle and Jackie 0’show for more than a decade.

The show came to a cataclysmic end on February 20 when Sandilands berated Henderson for what he claimed was her lax work ethic after she attempted to connect the former prince Andrew’s Jeffrey Epstein dramas with his astrology chart.

Kyle and Jackie O.
Kyle and Jackie O. Credit: instagram/supplied

“In summary, the applicants claim that the termination of Ms Henderson’s contract constituted adverse action,” ARN’s statement to the ASX read.

ARN said Henderson had sent a complaint letter that noted she “cannot continue to work with Mr Kyle Sandilands” and made psychosocial, health and safety and bullying complaints in relation to his conduct on and prior to February 20.

“It is alleged that the Complaint Letter involved the exercise or proposal to exercise workplace rights, and that the contract was terminated because of that exercise or proposed exercise, in alleged contravention of section 340 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

“It is also alleged the termination of her contract amounted to a repudiation of that agreement.”

Henderson’s legal team also claims ARN’s statement to the ASX on March 3 “included misleading and deceptive statements under the Australian Consumer Law.

“The applicants claim compensation of ‘at least $82,250,000’, and payment of a pecuniary penalty, plus interest and costs.”

ARN said it disputes Henderson’s claims and intends to defend the proceedings.

“Given the early stage of the matter, ARN is unable to reliably estimate the outcome or any potential financial impact.”

Latest Edition

The Nightly cover for 30-03-2026

Latest Edition

Edition Edition 30 March 202630 March 2026

How did one crazed killer evade an epic manhunt for seven months and hide in plain sight 200km away.