THE NEW YORK TIMES: What we know about the Cornell rape investigation
Explosive allegations involving seven men at an elite US university have reignited a case that prosecutors previously declined to pursue.
Prosecutors have reopened an investigation into a 2024 report by a Cornell University student who said she was raped at a fraternity house, raising questions about how the case was initially handled by law enforcement officials and the school.
Her allegations surfaced again two weeks ago after the student, identified as Jane Doe in a lawsuit, sued seven men, the university, her sorority and the fraternity. The case has led to fierce debate across the internet and drawn attention to the persistent problem of sexual assault on college campuses.
The district attorney for Tompkins County, home to Cornell in Ithaca, New York, said he would consider presenting the case to a grand jury. In 2024, immediately after her report, he declined to do so.
Sign up to The Nightly's newsletters.
Get the first look at the digital newspaper, curated daily stories and breaking headlines delivered to your inbox.
By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.Here’s what we know about the Cornell case.
What do we know about Jane Doe?
Because she is anonymous in the lawsuit, most of the details about her life are unknown. Her lawyer has said she is from a small town, about 1,000 miles away from Cornell. She arrived at the university as an undergraduate in August 2022, then dropped out after she said she was raped in 2024. She was 20 years old at the time and had been a member of the Tri-Delta sorority.
Her lawyer said she is struggling now with the aftermath of the incident and not in college.
What does the lawsuit say happened?
On Oct. 19, 2024, according to the lawsuit, the woman was raped repeatedly over nearly seven hours at the Chi Phi fraternity house in Ithaca.
The lawsuit states that she started off her night drinking vodka at the sorority house. Around 8:30 p.m., she took an Uber to an event her sorority was hosting at a bar. Although the bouncer correctly identified her as underage, she claims she was served at least one alcoholic beverage. By about 11 p.m., she had decided to walk about a mile to Chi Phi’s fraternity house to see a man she considered a friend.
Once she arrived, according to the lawsuit, the man and his fraternity brothers gave her a beer, marijuana, rum and ketamine. In the lawsuit, she claims she had not tried ketamine before and was pressured into snorting it. The lawsuit then details a series of sexual assaults and continued drug use involving her friend and six other men.
At about 1:42 a.m., one of the men sent a message to the Chi Phi Snapchat group inviting others to join in, using a crude name for female genitalia, according to a screenshot included in the lawsuit.
How did the police respond?
With the encouragement of friends, Jane Doe reported the incident to Cornell’s police department on Nov. 8, 2024.
The Cornell police sent a crime alert to campus, stating that a victim had reported being “sexually assaulted by several males and coerced into consuming ketamine and other drugs” at a fraternity house. In a message to campus before that Thanksgiving, Cornell’s president said that the university police department was continuing its criminal investigation, and that a second, administrative investigation into the allegations was underway.
Some time that month, Cornell police asked the Tompkins County district attorney’s office to review a statement from Jane Doe. Criminal investigators advised the police that they did not think they could bring criminal charges under New York state law based on the statement. Jane Doe’s lawyer said that after she gave her initial statement, no police or criminal investigators ever contacted her again.
It is unclear whether the police interviewed the men involved, or whether Jane Doe was ever told that her criminal case was not being pursued.
On Monday, the district attorney — who has released only excerpts from Jane Doe’s initial six-page statement — said that the statement did not make clear that she was forced into the sexual acts, or that she was incapacitated, though she was under the influence of drugs and alcohol.
How did Cornell respond?
The university immediately placed the fraternity, and the seven men she named in the lawsuit, on interim suspensions, the suit said.
Meanwhile, Cornell’s administrative Title IX justice process swung into motion to determine any potential discipline for the accused men. In May 2025, at least 12 hearings were held before a panel of faculty and staff, according to the woman’s lawsuit.
The accused men “were afforded the opportunity to mitigate their conduct by submitting essays to Cornell,” according to the lawsuit. Cornell does not deny that essays — which it calls reflection papers — were part of the punishment that the panel decided on for some of the men. But it stated Monday that it was not the only consequence for any of them.
Cornell, citing student privacy rules, declined to give details about how the individual men were punished. It said Monday that it gave the men “a range of sanctions, which included expulsions and suspensions.” Thomas Giuffra, the lawyer who represents Jane Doe, has said in interviews that only two of the men were expelled, and that his client did not feel justice had been done.
What has been the fallout from the lawsuit?
Millions of people have viewed the lawsuit or heard influencers and celebrities talk about the allegations online, bringing attention to the ongoing problem of sexual assault at Cornell and other college campuses. The mayor of Ithaca said Monday that he is proposing a ban on permits for Cornell events until the university reforms its sexual assault policies.
The pressure and attention pushed the Tompkins County district attorney to reopen the criminal case. A criminal investigator has reached out to Jane Doe’s lawyer, meaning that there could still be criminal charges in the case. Gov. Kathy Hochul has called for an independent investigation of Cornell’s handling of the case.
The names and photographs of the seven accused men are widely circulating online, as part of a mass movement that some see as a grassroots effort to bring accountability, and others view as a form of harassment of men not yet charged with any crime.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
© 2026 The New York Times Company
Originally published on The New York Times
